CLOSE OVERLAY

Guidance on Use of Channelization for Two-Lane Two-Way Work Zone Configurations

Project Details
STATUS

Completed

PROJECT NUMBER

19-720

START DATE

07/01/19

END DATE

02/28/21

FOCUS AREAS

Safety

RESEARCH CENTERS InTrans, CTRE
SPONSORS

Iowa Department of Transportation

Researchers
Principal Investigator
Shauna Hallmark

Director, InTrans

About the research

Addressing work zone crashes is critical for both the traveling public and highway workers. Two-lane two-way (TLTW) work zone configurations pose a special crash risk because the separation between opposing lanes of high-volume, high-speed, multilane traffic narrows to a head-to-head configuration.

Various traffic control devices (TCDs) are used to separate opposing traffic in TLTW configurations, with each TCD having advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost, safety, and other factors. At the same time, agencies have little guidance as to when and where different configurations should be used.

The objective of this research was to assess the advantages and disadvantages of various types of traffic control devices used to separate opposing lanes of traffic in TLTW work zones and to provide information about their use. The research included identifying the advantages and disadvantages of various types of TCDs, evaluating the effect of different TCDs on truck lane position in Iowa TLTW work zones, and analyzing crashes in Iowa TLTW work zones.

The results of the lane position assessment yielded useful and statistically significant preliminary results. In the analysis of lateral lane position, 20% of large trucks positioned themselves over the right lane line when a portable concrete barrier (PCB) was present, compared to 4% when only tubular markers were present or 3% when curbing with tubular markers was present. Large trucks were most likely to be positioned within their lane when separated from opposing traffic by only tubular markers (73%), compared to 51% when curbing with tubular markers was used or 43% when PCBs were used (43%). The analysis of crashes in TLTW work zones that used tubular markers only or PCBs did not yield useful insights due to the small sample size.

While no definitive conclusions could be drawn from the crash analysis due to small sample size, some initial patterns did emerge, indicating that evaluation of additional data would be useful.

TOP